Skip to main content
    Skip to explanation
    A.R.S. § 12-516

    Arizona's Pandemic Liability Shield for Health Professionals and Hospitals

    Verified May 17, 2026 • 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

    During a declared public health pandemic, Arizona health professionals and health care institutions that act in good faith are not liable for civil damages tied to care decisions made in support of the state's response. Plaintiffs must prove willful misconduct or gross negligence by clear and convincing evidence.

    Title 12, LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS

    azleg.gov

    What This Statute Says

    This is the medical companion to A.R.S. 12-515. It carves out a higher liability bar for health professionals and health care institutions specifically.

    A health professional or health care institution that acts in good faith is not liable for damages in any civil action for an injury or death that is alleged to be caused by the health professional's or health care institution's action or omission while providing health care services in support of this state's response to the state of emergency declared by the governor unless it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the health professional or health care institution failed to act or acted and the failure to act or action was due to that health professional's or health care institution's wilful misconduct or gross negligence.

    A.R.S. § 12-516(A)

    What the Shield Covers

    The shield reaches conduct during pandemic response, including:

    • Delaying or canceling nonurgent or elective procedures.
    • Providing nursing care or procedures under emergency conditions.
    • Altering diagnosis or treatment in response to federal, state, or local directives.
    • Acts or omissions caused by lack of staffing, equipment, or supplies attributable to the emergency.

    A health professional is presumed to have acted in good faith if they reasonably attempted to comply with published federal or state pandemic guidance.

    What This Means for Arizona Families

    If you lost a loved one to medical care or staffing decisions made during a declared pandemic emergency, this statute will likely shape any civil claim the estate pursues. The clear and convincing evidence standard for gross negligence is a tall hurdle. Many cases that would survive under ordinary medical malpractice standards do not survive under this shield.

    An Arizona medical malpractice attorney working with a probate attorney can evaluate whether the conduct rises to the level the statute requires. Where a recovery is possible, it flows into the estate alongside the probate. Our FAQ on probate timelines in Arizona covers how civil recoveries fit into the larger administration.

    A. If the governor declares a state of emergency for a public health pandemic pursuant to title 26, chapter 2, a health professional or health care institution that acts in good faith is not liable for damages in any civil action for an injury or death that is alleged to be caused by the health professional's or health care institution's action or omission while providing health care services in support of this state's response to the state of emergency declared by the governor unless it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the health professional or health care institution failed to act or acted and the failure to act or action was due to that health professional's or health care institution's wilful misconduct or gross negligence. B. Subsection A of this section applies to any action or omission that is alleged to have occurred during a person's screening, assessment, diagnosis or treatment and that is related to the public health pandemic that is the subject of the state of emergency or any action or omission that occurs in the course of providing a person with health care services and that is unrelated to the public health pandemic that is the subject of the state of emergency if the health professional's or health care institution's action or omission was in good faith support of this state's response to the state of emergency, including any of the following: 1. Delaying or canceling a procedure that the health professional determined in good faith was a nonurgent or elective dental, medical or surgical procedure. 2. Providing nursing care or procedures. 3. Altering a person's diagnosis or treatment in response to an order, directive or guideline that is issued by the federal government, this state or a local government. 4. An act or omission undertaken by a health professional or health care institution because of a lack of staffing, facilities, equipment, supplies or other resources that are attributable to the state of emergency and that render the health professional or health care institution unable to provide the level or manner of care to a person that otherwise would have been required in the absence of the state of emergency. C. A health professional or health care institution is presumed to have acted in good faith if the health professional or health care institution relied on and reasonably attempted to comply with applicable published guidance relating to the public health pandemic that was issued by a federal or state agency. This subsection does not prohibit a party from introducing any other evidence that proves the health professional or health care institution acted in good faith.

    This page provides general legal information about Arizona statutes and is not legal advice. For guidance on how this law applies to your situation, speak with a qualified attorney.

    Get Started Today

    Need Help With Your Estate Plan?

    Whether you are just getting started or reviewing an existing plan, RJP Estate Planning works hand in hand with experienced estate planning counsel to help you understand your options.